Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 41(5): 396-404, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22241874

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to verify the concordance of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and MRI evaluation among four radiologists in detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes of oral cancer patients. METHODS: Ten patients underwent clinical and imaging examinations (CECT and MRI). Four radiologists, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMRs) and two medical radiologists (MRs), independently analysed the images twice. Cohen's kappa index and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to verify the concordance between all analyses. RESULTS: Regarding the interobserver agreement, the OMRs presented excellent kappa values for determining the regional lymph nodes (N-stage) in both CECT and MRI. The MRs presented moderate agreement for CECT evaluation at the first reading, but no concordance was found for the other analyses. When each imaging modality was analysed separately, kappa values were higher between all examiners. Greater variability was demonstrated between N-stage evaluation using different examinations. All radiologists were able to identify a greater number of metastatic lymph nodes in CECT than in MRI, except one MR, but no significant difference was found for all readers. The differences between the number of metastatic lymph nodes among all radiologists were not statistically significant. Moderate intraobserver agreement was observed for CECT and MRI evaluation, except for one MR. CONCLUSIONS: The differences found between the N-stage performed by OMRs and MRs support the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in the imaging evaluation of metastatic nodes. Further studies are necessary to confirm which imaging modality should be employed when evaluating neck areas.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/secundário , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Pescoço/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Iopamidol , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico por imagem , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
3.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 31(1): 88-90, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19696137

RESUMO

Lipoid proteinosis is a rare genodermatosis characterized by multisystem involvement due to intracellular deposition of an amorphous hyaline material. Lipoid proteinosis is caused by mutations in the ECM1 gene. In many patients, skin and mucosa abnormalities are the first manifestation. When the CNS is affected, a wide variety of neurologic abnormalities may be present. The hallmark findings are calcifications, mostly occurring in the amygdalae, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, or even the striatum. Present in half of the patients, moniliform blepharosis is considered a pathognomonic finding. In the other half of patients imaging could assist in the diagnosis. The authors present a series of 3 cases of lipoid proteinosis with brief clinical data and imaging findings.


Assuntos
Tonsila do Cerebelo , Encefalopatias/etiologia , Calcinose/etiologia , Corpo Estriado , Proteinose Lipoide de Urbach e Wiethe/complicações , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...